Facial recognition technologies already used in 11 EU - Euractiv Eight cities in California and Massachusetts have banned government use of facial recognition altogether, while Portland, Oregon, is considering going further by banning both public- and private-sector use of the technology. The measure, which will last until at least 2023, does not ban police from using facial recognition in other types of cameras. Parker, the lobbyist, called the law "the first in the nation to require the accuracy of facial recognition technology used by law enforcement to be evaluated by the U.S government" and "the nations most stringent set of rules for its use.". Europe edges closer to a ban on facial recognition - POLITICO The project was called Diversity of Faces. The IBM training database was then used by Microsoft and Amazon to improve their facial recognition systems. To ban it or chip away from its application would be a little short-sighted, said Mayor John Dennis, a former police officer. 13 Cities Where Police Are Banned From Using Facial Recognition Tech For now, left-wing and liberal lawmakers are focused on maintaining their momentum for a facial recognition ban until the European Parliament formally secures its position in a vote by the end of the year. His views on regulating privacy rights eventually became law. Former Virginia Delegate Lashrecse Aird, who spearheaded last year's law, said companies this year wanted a model to defeat bans across the country. Portland's Public & Private Facial Recognition Ban Explained Lisa Palmer, an . In New York, state investigators have used facial recognition to make thousands of arrests and identify more than 20,0000 cases of identity theft and fraud since 2010. However, unlike Illinois, there is no private right of action. Washington lawmakers have also introduced a bill that would prohibit police officers from using the results from a facial recognition system as the sole basis for establishing probable cause in criminal investigations and requires that facial recognition system results be used in conjunction with other evidence to establish probable cause (, In New York, lawmakers have introduced two bills that prohibit law enforcement officers from using facial recognition technology (, ) as well as a bill that prevents the use of facial recognition technology in schools until 2022 (, ). One of the. Facial recognition system - Wikipedia Maine passes the strongest state facial recognition ban yet After the loss in Virginia, civil liberties groups are escalating in New Orleans. Opinion: How to counter China's scary use of AI tech - Los Angeles Times At least seven states adopted face recognition to verify the identity of people applying for assistance such as unemployment benefits. "Singapore has plans to install 100,000 facial-recognition cameras on lampposts, Chicago police have asked for 30,000 more, and Moscow intends to have 174,000 by the end of this year.". A 2019 report by the National Institute for Standards and Technology said the majority of commercial algorithms tested showed unequal performance on different demographics, but also that any differences were minimal or undetectable for some of the most accurate and widely used algorithms. States arent rushing to boot up replacements. The European governments could reach their final position before the end of the year, according to two EU diplomats. Many uses of face recognition have lower stakes than in policing; some, like unlocking a phone with a glance, can be seductively convenient. All rights reserved. Microsoft bans police from using its facial-recognition technology Police departments, schools, retailers, and airlines are using facial recognition to do everything from ensuring student attendance to identifying criminal suspects. "Addressing discriminatory policing by double-checking the algorithm is a bit like trying to solve police brutality by checking the gun isn't racist: strictly speaking it's better than the alternative, but the real problem is the person holding it," said Os Keyes, an Ada Lovelace Fellow at University of Washington. For example, law enforcement agencies can access the DMV photo databases without individuals prior notification or consent that their pictures may be used in this manner. Maryland lawmakers have introduced legislation that would prohibit state and local government units from using facial recognition software (MD SB 857) and require businesses to provide notice when facial recognition is being used and to generally require consent from an individual before their facial image can be included in a database (MD SB 476). Portland passes broadest facial recognition ban in the US In 2016, New Hampshire strengthened its laws on facial recognition by enacting a bill similar to Oregons that also prohibited police from using facial recognition to analyze images captured from body cameras. Brandeis explained: Justice Brandeis advocated limiting law enforcements use of wiretapping. The City of Portland has passed a law banning the public and private use of facial recognition technology and it appears to have gone off without a hitch. Caitlin Seeley George, a campaign director at nonprofit Fight for the Future, finds the spread of face recognition in airports and other areas of daily life concerning. Beginning July 1, police can use facial recognition tools that achieve 98% or higher accuracy in at least one NIST test with minimal variation across demographics. A facial recognition system is a technology capable of matching a human face from a digital image or a video frame against a database of faces. When we do things for convenience we may not be thinking through all the repercussions.. In 2021, TikTok announced that it settled an Illinois class action for $92 million. Browse an unrivalled portfolio of real-time and historical market data and insights from worldwide sources and experts. Notably, Facebook announced it would stop using facial recognition just a few months later. In 2008, the state passed the Biometric Information Privacy Act, or BIPA. The WIRED conversation illuminates how technology is changing every aspect of our livesfrom culture to business, science to design. Facial recognition has become a frequent topic of conversation at the local, state, and federal levels. Several states and municipalities are seeking to protect persons from abuse of biometrics by private companies and by law enforcement. Ban dangerous facial recognition technology that amplifies racist After Hurricane Dorian hit in late summer of 2019, the Bahamas launched a . Thank goodness that Somerville, with its public sector ban, applies a different logic than, say, Plano Texas, which has enthusiastically adopted facial recognition technology with little public oversight. . Fear of crime is driving us, or being used to drive us, to give up our privacy by allowing law enforcement to use those ubiquitous street cameras to identify where we are, and even to listen to our words to recognize us. Citing human rights risks, UN calls for ban on certain AI tech until [1/3]A facial recognition camera is shown pointed at the entrance of a Rite Aid store in downtown Los Angeles, California, U.S., October 16, 2019. Face recognition ban? Some cities, states and lawmakers push for one But uses of this technology go beyond unlocking smartphones. Police departments, schools, retailers, and airlines are using facial recognition to do everything from ensuring student attendance to identifying criminal suspects. Australia needs to face up to the dangers of facial recognition Inside the Secretive Life-Extension Clinic, The 13 Best Electric Bikes for Every Kind of Ride, Power Up Anywhere With Our Favorite Portable Chargers, Its Time to Stop Arresting People for Trolling the Government. Facial Recognition Laws Are (Literally) All Over the Map by scanning shoppers faces and comparing them to photos in a database of known shoplifters. California passed a new law that banned law enforcement from using facial recognition in their body cameras but not in other police surveillance cameras. Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. Amnesty International today launches a global campaign to ban the use of facial recognition systems, a form of mass surveillance that amplifies racist policing and threatens the right to protest. If we end up with sensible national policies constraining the use of biometric datawhich is by no means certainit will largely be thanks to the role of local government in America. In 2019, California became the third state to ban the use of facial recognition technology to analyze images captured by police body cameras. Shaun Moore, a Pangiam executive who joined the company when it acquired his face recognition startup Trueface earlier this year, says the debate about police use of the technology can obscure its value in other areas. Washington's largest county bans government use of facial recognition software The county is home to facial recognition software makers Amazon and Microsoft. At the same time, completely unfettered use of private biometric systems seems incompatible with American values. "Technology is needed to solve these crimes and to hold individuals accountable," police Superintendent Shaun Ferguson told reporters as he called on the city council to repeal a ban that went into effect last year. Eric Adams, who became mayor in January, said a month later that it could be used safely under existing rules, while his predecessor Bill de Blasio had called for more caution. While other US cities, including Boston, Portland and San Francisco, have banned the use of facial technology by law enforcement, New York Police Department [NYPD] continues to use the technology to intimidate and harass law abiding residents, as seen during last year's the Black Lives Matters protests. Activists in New York are also pressing for a facial recognition ban despite increased crime. Today as when Justice Brandeis opined on the topic 94 years ago, we are still balancing our right of privacy from the law enforcement with our fear of crime and the need to allow law enforcement to freely act. One black American spent 11 days in jail after being wrongly . Massachusetts Passes One Of The First State-Wide Laws On Facial Two dozen cities and states prohibit use of the tech. Though the recent studies have eased lawmakers' reservations, debate is ongoing. As is often the case, policymakers will need to address concerns on a rapidly progressing technology. However, facial recognitions use in school has been met with mixed reactions from parents. Illinois passed a law that permits individuals to sue over the collection and use of a range of biometric data, including fingerprints and retinal scans as well as facial recognition technology.